Creating filters
A filter is a saved slice of your portfolio, built from asset classes and your own tags. Understanding how blocks combine is the difference between a filter that works and one that quietly matches everything.
On this page
A filter is a saved slice of your finances. Once saved you can pin it to the sidebar and return to it in one click, instead of rebuilding the same selection every time.
Filters are built from two ingredients: asset classes, which Gylder assigns, and tags, which you create yourself.
How blocks combine
This is the one part worth reading slowly, because getting it backwards produces a filter that looks reasonable and matches far more than you intended.
A filter is made of blocks. The rule is:
- Within a block, classes and tags both have to apply
- Between blocks, matching any block is enough
So blocks are OR, and the contents of a block are AND. In plain terms: a filter shows anything that matches any block, and to match a block an item has to satisfy both the classes and the tags in it.
That gives you one block for a simple filter, and extra blocks when you want to combine things that have nothing in common.
An example of each
One block. Classes: investments. Tags: long-term. This matches investments tagged long-term.
An investment without the tag does not match. A tagged property does not match either, because it
fails the class part.
Two blocks. Block 1: classes investments, tag long-term. Block 2: classes cash. This matches
long-term investments or any cash at all. The tag requirement applies only inside the block it
sits in.
That second example is the reason blocks exist. Without them you could not express "these specific investments, plus all my cash" in a single filter.
Matching any tag or all tags
When a block has more than one tag, you choose how they combine:
- Any tag matches an item carrying at least one of them
- All tags matches only an item carrying every one
"Any" widens as you add tags. "All" narrows. A block set to all tags with several unrelated tags is the usual cause of a filter that matches nothing at all, because very few holdings carry every label at once.
Naming, icon and colour
Give the filter a name you will recognise in a list six months from now. Long-term investments
beats Filter 2.
You can also give it an icon and a colour, which is how it appears in the sidebar. Tapping a selected icon or colour again clears it. The palette is shared with tags and profile avatars, so a colour means the same thing everywhere in the app.
Pinning to the sidebar
Saved filters live on the Filters & Tags page. From there you can pin one to the sidebar for one-click access.
Pinning is capped at seven. The cap is deliberate: a sidebar with twenty pinned filters is harder to navigate than one with none, and the point of pinning is quick access to the few you actually use. Unpin one to make room.
Unpinned filters are not lost. They stay on the Filters & Tags page.
What a filter changes
Applying a filter narrows what you are looking at, and everything downstream follows. On the investments dashboard, the holdings table narrows, and so do the charts and the other tabs.
One consequence that surprises people: position weight recalculates within the filter, so weights still add to 100% inside it. That is what you want when asking how concentrated you are within a slice, but it does mean a weight seen under a filter is not the same number as that holding's weight in the whole portfolio.
When a filter matches nothing
Work through these:
- Check the tag match mode. "All tags" with several tags is the most common cause.
- Check the classes and tags are in the same block. If they are meant to be an either/or, they belong in separate blocks.
- Check the tags are actually applied. A tag that exists but has been attached to nothing will match nothing. See tagging holdings.
Was this helpful?